> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:ietf-dkim- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of J.D. Falk > Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 1:17 PM > To: DKIM List > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs > > If this is primarily a workaround for perceived limitations of > reputation systems, then I humbly suggest that the premise is invalid. > Today's reputation systems aren't static; the operators are constantly > changing them in reaction to what the spammers do.
I realize that the answer to this will be largely speculation, but: Will that continue to be true in the IPv6-based and domain-based future of reputation systems? Having to make ongoing adjustments might be a hindrance to such systems. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
