On 28/09/10 23:02, Douglas Otis wrote: > On 9/27/10 9:47 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >>> On Monday, September 27, 2010 4:19 PM, Douglas Otis wrote: > > TPA-Label involves ADSP being discussed on the dkim list.
I've no idea precisely what Doug means here, but to avoid doubt: the DKIM WG has a charter that does not currently include work on TPA nor other possible alternatives, nor any other tweak or alternative to ADSP. There does seem to be interest (though nothing like consensus) in these however so we're not trying to stop discussion for now, in the hope that one or other garners sufficient consensus that we might re-charter. (And in any case, its clear that asking people on this list to stop typing is currently pointless;-) So these are all "unofficial" activities in the sense that there is no plan for the WG to produce any RFCs. S. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
