> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Douglas Otis > Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 12:00 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Authorizing List Domains > > The ATPS draft incorrectly assumes two things: > > 1) All desired third-party services use DKIM.
For the purposes of the experiment, that seems to be a reasonable assumption given the associated mechanisms. It would however be trivial to decouple it from DKIM (or more specifically, ADSP). > 2) Additional header fields are not needed to ensure proper message > sorting or recognition. I'm open to adding such extensions to the experiment if they're deemed necessary, but I don't want to pack the content of the record with a bunch of stuff until that's obvious. Over-engineering these efforts up-front has been proven a very effective way of rendering them unusable. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
