On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:52:01 +0100, John Levine <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> This might be a good time to remind people that MLMs in their >>> current form are not broken, and any proposal that requires them to >>> stop doing something that they're currently doing, like rewriting >>> messages or adding message tags, is a non-starter. > >> Since nothing requires anyone do anything with respect to DKIM, I'm >> hard pressed to imagine something that doesn't meet that requirement. > > I was thinking of the various proposals to rewrite From: addresses, to > outlaw subject tags and message footers, and otherwise change the > behaviors that MLM users expect in order to make them conform to > various ideas of how DKIM and/or ADSP are supposed to work. But nowhere has anyone suggested REQUIRING any MLM to do any of those things. They are all offered as suggesstions for things MLMs MIGHT do do get themselves out of such DKIM-caused troubles as they find themselves in. -- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Email: [email protected] snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5 _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
