On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Douglas Otis <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there a safe way to shift DKIM signature compliance based upon the > From header field to that of the Sender header field?
We've avoided the Sender header because most folks are confused when Outlook says "on behalf of". And not all MUAs display that anyway. I do agree that DKIM signature compliance should no be based on From. In fact it should be a new domain/sub-domain altogether. -- Jeff Macdonald Ayer, MA _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
