--On 20 October 2010 15:12:47 +0100 Charles Lindsey <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> When I said good, I meant credible, not just one that mechanically >> validates. I hope that we all agree that a signature from a domain about >> which one knows nothing is not usefully different from no signature at >> all. > > A reputation service can only say that a domain is > BAD > GOOD > or NO EVIDENCE AVAILABLE EITHER WAY. > Actually, a reputation service could offer a score that's more subtle than good/bad. And, it could offer address reputation rather than domain reputation. That would be far more suitable for domains like the large email service providers, which have a mix of good and bad users. <http://www.dkim-reputation.org/start/> offers address based reputation service. I've not used the service, so can't vouch for it. -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex 01273-873148 x3148 For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/ _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
