--On 19 October 2010 07:31:58 -0700 Michael Thomas <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 10/19/2010 06:18 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: >> valid signature + good signer >> + no suspicious unsigned content -> good message > > Has nobody learned that "good" signers from "good" authors > can still be evil? I mean come on, people, bot'd machines? This > is horrible advice. > > s/unsigned/; and this works. > > Mike Well, everything's relative. If we can get to the point where a bot'd machine can only send email "From:" it's real owner, that'll be a huge improvement on the current situation. At that point, we can start to pressure the real owner into fixing their machine (say, by emailing them or their domain support, or by blacklisting their email) -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex 01273-873148 x3148 For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/ _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
