> I caught up on the back and forth on IDNA. The incompatibilities between > IDN2003 and IDN2008 are limited to the encoding of two uncommon > characters, which the IDNA group think is not a big deal, hence their > decision not to change the xn-- prefix. Really, we should change the > references to the current standard.
I'm inclined to agree, but let me get a reading from the IESG on whether this will affect the standards-track status, and how they would handle the obsolete reference if we didn't make the change. Barry, as chair _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
