Hi Murray, At 10:56 22-10-10, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >I understand your point, but what I'm saying is that the DNSDIR >people, on reviewing RFC5451, were not satisfied with that line of >reasoning, resulting in a DISCUSS from the OPS AD until I went back >and indicated for every use of "domain" which thing I meant. I'm >simply trying to avoid that.
And that is what the suggested change is for as it has a reference to what "thing" the document is talking about. >Then I guess I don't understand the basis for the suggested >change. The citation you This is covered in John Levine's message. Regards, -sm _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
