> -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen Farrell [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 10:35 AM > To: Murray S. Kucherawy > Cc: Michael Thomas; Hanno Böck; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] ECC (was RE: DKIM using old RSA padding?) > > The time to switch for DKIM is likely to be when you no longer > want to sign with an RSA key that fits a DNS response nicely. > Not sure off the top of my head what exactly that would be in > terms of RSA modulus size.
Based on the work I did on resolver truncation handling, I believe that's 2048-bit RSA keys, but I don't recall exactly at the moment because it was a while ago. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
