On 2/28/11 3:27 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > > On 28 Feb 2011, at 19:47, Dave CROCKER<[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> On 2/28/2011 1:34 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote: >>> The time to switch for DKIM is likely to be when ... >> >> >> Just to be entirely pedantic: >> >> 1. This topic is out of scope for the wg at this time. > > Asking is fine IMO, but yes, we're not chartered for that as I said earlier. > (Though admittedly not directly when responding to Murray.) > >> >> 2. There is no industry view that we need to stop using the current DKIM >> crypto algorithms anytime soon. There's nothing wrong with adding to the >> repertoire of algorithms if someone is motivated, but there is no industry >> urgency. >> >> Yes? > > Absolutely. Later is plenty soon enough.
There's also more to it than just the padding. You'd need to convey the additional parameters needed to verify the signature. spt _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
