> Silly question (?): I was going to write a long rant, but I'll just say, you're right, it was a silly question.
R's, John PS: If you believe that you have a problem that would be solved if you could check slightly more of the submitters' signatures on list mail, there's nothing stopping you from writing a mutant DKIM checker that applies heuristics to the subject line or other parts of a message to try and guess what might have changed and reconstruct the message that was signed. I think that Mike Thomas said he did something like that. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
