On Mar 31, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Al Iverson wrote: >> I think the MLM document makes all of this stuff pretty clear already. > > It does to me; it seems like dropping the original signature and > signing with the list manager site signature is the appropriate way to > go.
Yup. The problem isn't that we haven't made this advice public (though it may carry more weight after last call.) The problem is that it takes a long time for these ideas to disseminate to all list software deployed everywhere -- especially the outdated versions of MailMan that many sites run on autopilot. FWIW, here's how I got DKIM signatures on messages resent by the lists I host with MailMan two years ago, without needing to wait for MailMan to update anything at all: http://www.circleid.com/posts/dkim_for_discussion_lists/ -- J.D. Falk the leading purveyor of industry counter-rhetoric solutions _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
