> specification. For this reason, I am formally proposing that the i= tag > and supporting text be removed from 4871bis.
Gosh Jim, you're probably not surprised when I say +1 to that :-) While the i=/g= were attempting to solve problems, I agree that the spec has moved on and simplifying to just d= has considerable crispness. As for the other follow-up, I am not aware of Yahoo using i= as a discriminator. Mark. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
