Hi Hector, At 11:18 01-04-2011, Hector Santos wrote: >Off hand, and I have to go back, I believe seeing some systems using >Authetication-Results to always include a i= as part of its A-R header >result whether it was defined or not and when not, a default value is >displayed. For example, this is the A-R result for my signature into >this IETF-DKIM list: > > Authentication-Results: sbh17.songbird.com; > dkim=pass (1024-bit key) [email protected]
[snip] >Does that mean, a proposal to remove i= in DKIM-BASE, would imply an >update to the A-R draft is necessary? RFC 5451 is a proposed standard. It is not a product of the DKIM WG. It's up to the author of that RFC to see whether an update is necessary. Regards, -sm _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
