> Moreover, it's substantially more than the percentage that appear to be > using "x=", but we're not considering removing that here.
I suspect I'm not the only person who'd be thilled if we got rid of x=, since it's yet another unverifiable assertion, but I figure we're draining one swamp at a time. Regards, John Levine, [email protected], Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
