On 4/5/2011 6:40 PM, Franck Martin wrote: > So if we keep i= as is in the spec, we can conclude the standard process and > give a meaning of i= outside this spec in another RFC?
How is a receiver ever going to know that this new meaning applies? There is an installed base if i= generation and consumption. Changing i= later creates an amiguity with that installed usage. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
