OK. So the capability exists, but people choose not to use it. Some people in fact choose to disable this capability; note that a) ADSP is an add-on, not the DKIM core, and b) the actual uptake of ADSP on the receive side is not known to be large.
So the suggestion is to add a second capability that performs the same function as the first, on the theory that, this time, folks will use it for that purpose? The logic sequence has some problems, but I don't believe it's reflection of the current situation is one of them. d/ On 4/3/2011 10:02 PM, Franck Martin wrote: >> Why doesn't the d= value satisfy this function just as well? >> >> Remember that d= can have sub-domains, to distinguish different >> streams. >> >> > I'll answer: Paypal and ADSP > > Yes it can be done, are people doing it: no > > people are using their domain name for their corporate email and application, > they are not ready to do corp.mydomain.com > > http://postmaster.facebook.com/outbound > > Facebook is mixing up their corporate email with their users email... > -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
