On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:45:22 +0100, Douglas Otis <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Review the charter exclusions. There can be no deeper meaning defined > for the i= field. But undoubtedly individuals are going to use the field in ways that they find useful to their purpose (with knowledge of their own situations). All I am trying to say is that the 'i=' tag is not so totally broken that it is useless for any pourpose whatever. Hence it should be kept, since it is already there and will get used. -- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Email: [email protected] Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5 _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
