On 4/5/2011 1:29 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>> On Behalf Of John R. Levine
>> Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 6:51 PM
>> To: Tony Hansen
>> Cc: IETF DKIM WG
>> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: Removal of AUID (i= tag/value)
>>
>> Three questions spring to mind:
>>
>> a) What does "authenticated user" mean, in general for domains you don't
>> know?
>>
>> b) Why should I believe your authenticated user flag?
>>
>> c) Even if I do believe you, so what?
> You had me up to (c). If I do believe you, why wouldn't I act on your
> assertions?
I'm not much interested in the "authenticated user" for domains I don't
know. However, I'm *very* interested in the "authenticated user" for
domains that I *do* know.
As for what "authenticated user" means, I think it's a user whose
identity the domain has verified to their satisfaction, such as through
a login process.
Tony Hansen
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
