> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Dave CROCKER
> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 2:24 PM
> To: IETF DKIM WG
> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: Removal of AUID (i= tag/value)
>
> > We all filter on From:. If you know the domain is well-behaved, what's
> > the point of using i= rather than From: ?
>
> This thread has a basic flaw: it is predicated on a a particular
> interpretation
> of i=, which is undocumented and certainly not standardized.
Of course, but a signature bearing a "d=" representing an ADMD with which I
have an a priori arrangement to interpret "i=" in a particular way could be
useful. Such out-of-band arrangements certainly can't be standardized, but
that doesn't mean there's no possible use for it at all anywhere, does it?
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
