Rolf E. Sonneveld wrote:
> -1. I suggest to add clarifications etc. to a future update of RFC5863
> (deployment and operations document).
So you agree clarification is required but not for RFC4871bis?
Interesting. Lets see:
1) A few words clarification for DKIM-BASE standard. A little
confusion for Windows people and domains using
ISP managed DNS zones.
versus
2) Add new section in RFC5863 to match Create/Publish examples
hopefully covering all bases. Hope, Maybe?
--
HLS
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
