On 4/27/11 12:47 PM, Hector Santos wrote: > Rolf E. Sonneveld wrote: > >> -1. I suggest to add clarifications etc. to a future update of >> RFC5863 (deployment and operations document). > > So you agree clarification is required but not for RFC4871bis?
No. Just: IF clarification is required, it has to be in an operations-/Informational- /BCP-type document. Together with some other DKIM related DNS advise (for example: last couple of months I came across three different cases of DNS admins, which broke up DKIM (and SPF) records in multiple pieces enclosed by double-quotes, as their DNS management interface didn't support input of long records). > > Interesting. Lets see: > > 1) A few words clarification for DKIM-BASE standard. A little > confusion for Windows people and domains using > ISP managed DNS zones. Well, maybe it's time Windows people leave their .local zones and discover a whole world beyond those windows... /rolf _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
