At 05:22 16-05-2011, John R. Levine wrote: >I realize there are people who wish it meant something else, typically >simultaneously saying "this mail is very important" and "throw this mail >away", which is absurd, or perhaps "if there's no signature, handle it
Yes. >The definition in the RFC was hammered out after a great deal of debate, >and I see no evidence that the definition is defective. ADSP has plenty >of problems, but the definition of discardable isn't one of them. I don't see any value in reopening a discussion about the definition. Regards, -sm _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
