> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Michael Thomas > Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 10:00 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] New canonicalizations > > My guess is that admins just don't understand any of the subtleties, > have heard lore that "relaxed" is "better" and just click "relaxed" > wherever they find it. It may also be the case that some implementations > don't even have separate nerd knobs for headers and body > canonicalization.
Some of the data (especially message-specific stuff) are certainly skewed by the huge senders that use one or the other. It's more interesting to look at percentage by domains. For the most part what I hear is "relaxed/simple" is the BCP, but Gmail (for example) uses "relaxed/relaxed" which really pulls things quite a bit in one direction. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
