> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Hector Santos > Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 1:30 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] New canonicalizations > > The collection you have is an aggregate of many sites. However, in > reality each site will have a different PCN.
Naturally. And we can select for the data for a specific site if that's useful. But in terms of input for developing a standard, even you must agree that an aggregate view is at least as important as a local one. But since you asked, selecting only for my own server, there are 11 domains in the top relaxed/relaxed senders list before we hit the first obvious spammer. Those are responsible for 7301 relaxed/relaxed messages out of the 16581 total that server has seen, or 44%. And there are lots of obviously legitimate senders below that, but I wanted to keep this report simple. Even so, it still doesn't concur with the apparent extremeness of your data, nor do I understand why this is an interesting statistic. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
