Ian Eiloart wrote: > On 20 May 2011, at 05:24, Hector Santos wrote: > >> In this case, if this is enforced with a MUST, for a system that is >> not 8BITMIME ready but is adding DKIM signing support, to remain >> compliant it is far more feasible to add a rule to a DKIM signing >> component: >> >> If mail is 8bit then SKIP signing. > > But why skip? Usually the message won't be downgraded. And even if they > are, usually a broken signature will cause no harm.
Thats the problem - define "usually" and also define "no harm." -- Hector Santos, CTO http://www.santronics.com http://santronics.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
