Hi Rolf, At 15:09 23-05-2011, Rolf E. Sonneveld wrote: >SpamAssassin assigns a score of something like 0.1 for a message >carrying a DKIM signature and compensates that with -0.1 if the >signature can be verified to be correct. Effectively, this means SA is >penalizing broken signatures...
Not really. There is a score so that the rules are evaluated. It doesn't weigh much in practice. Regards, -sm _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
