On 25 May 2011, at 02:13, John R. Levine wrote: >> Interestingly enough, outlook tells me this message has been tampered >> with, but not sure why... > > Probably doesn't have the Comodo validation certificate.
Maybe, but my Mac does, and it complains. As does a Thunderbird client and an Outlook client. That's three different setups that are complaining about your signature now. Whether they're right or wrong is largely irrelevant. The fact is that S/MIME doesn't seem to be bullet proof. > I took the copy of my message that came back from the mailing list, ran it > through some rather violent transformations (mail to usenet and back) and the > S/MIME signature still is OK. > > R's, > John > >> >> On 5/24/11 15:35 , "John R. Levine" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> Are there the same issues with PGP or S/Mime email? >>> >>> Generally no. They're a group of MIME parts that shouldn't need to be >>> recoded, or even if they are, will decode to the same value. > _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html -- Ian Eiloart Postmaster, University of Sussex +44 (0) 1273 87-3148 _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
