Alessandro Vesely wrote: > On 27/May/11 19:16, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >> I'm all for including experimental code in future releases of our >> stuff, especially if it's an experiment other implementations are >> trying. But I need to see a spec first, or enough detail that I >> could write one. > > For the body, I brought some ideas[1]. For MIME header fields, > punctuation and boundaries need to be omitted as well. For other > header fields, including the DKIM-Signature, it is probably enough to > remove just any white space. > [1] http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2011q2/016692.html > > IMHO, the "hard parts" of the code are (i) selecting a MIME parser, > and (ii) finding a good way to structure experimental C14Ns and handle > double (triple?) signatures in the existing code.
Hi Alessandro, Can you come up with a before and after example? An example showing a snippet of what would be the original MIME message text and what would be final stripping down C14N version? -- HLS _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
