On 6/23/11 8:34 PM, John R. Levine wrote: >>> I'm pretty sure that we have uniformly agreed not to attempt to do >>> MUA design, so, no, it doesn't. We have no idea what is displayed >>> in the message. We have no idea if the message will ever be >>> displayed at all. >> Ian, >> >> John is right. Most headers are displayed selecting top-down > If you'll review the message you were quoting, I said "We have no idea > what is displayed in the message." I have done some experiements, and > MUAs are utterly inconsistent. Assuming this is some other protocol layers problem; to ensure consistency between any possible display and DKIM validation, this can only be done by excluding illegal duplicates from verifying as valid DKIM signatures. Is there any other way? In such a case, the selection order of the MUA or email sorter would not matter.
-Doug _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
