On 24 Jun 2011, at 05:55, John R. Levine wrote: >> Assuming this is some other protocol layers problem; to ensure consistency >> between any possible display and DKIM validation, ... > > ... is, for about the hundredth time, not DKIM's job. > > Please chant "we have no idea how MUAs will display mail" over and over > until you believe it. This includes valid 5322 mail. >
So, heck, what's the point in validating anything? After all, the MUA may simply display this message as a link to a canadian pharm site! I think we can be pretty sure that - if there's only one "From:" header - then the MUA won't display an unsigned From: header in preference to a signed one. -- Ian Eiloart Postmaster, University of Sussex +44 (0) 1273 87-3148 _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
