This seems like a reasonable step to take.
Tony Hansen
On 9/11/2013 7:52 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Barry has agreed to sponsor the enclosed status change.
>
> He would like to see discussion formal request.
>
> (If you've already responded to my /in/formal query earlier today on
> the dmarc@ietf list, please now lodge any formal comments you wish to
> make on either of the two lists here.
>
> d/
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Request to move RFC 5617 (ADSP) to Historic
> Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 16:09:14 -0700
> From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
> Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
> To: Barry Leiba <[email protected]>, Pete Resnick
> <[email protected]>
>
> Folks,
>
> This is a formal request, to have DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)
> Author Domain Signing Practices (ADSP) (RFC 5617) moved to Historic
> status.
>
> It has garnered almost no deployment and use, in the 4 years since its
> advancement to IETF Proposed Standard.
>
> In addition, newer work, DMARC, covers the same general email functional
> area and already has garnered quite a bit of deployment and use. Hence
> it will clarify things for the marketplace to remove standards status
> from the apparently-competing, but actually-useless ADSP specification.
>
> Today I sent a query to the MAAWG Technical committee and the IETF DMARC
> mailing lists, to assess support for the status change. Within only a
> few hours, I've already seen quite a few +1s, and no -1s.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> d/
>
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
