> If anyone has technical comments, data collection, or any other stuff > that's relevant to the ADs' judgment of whether moving ADSP to > Historic status is the right thing, those comments are welcome here. ... > Discussion of ADSP *ONLY*. No discussion of DMARC. No discussion of > people. No snideness. Just stop all that. > > The only thing I will be considering, as this discussion proceeds and > as I analyze it, is what arguments have been made about ADSP, and > whether or not its spec should be classified as Historic.
I'd like to add that in order to keep the discussion from fragmenting, I would prefer that all discussion of this happen on <[email protected]>. I will keep watching this list as well, and will try to consider comments made here, but it'll be easier on everyone if there aren't separate discussions in two (or more) places. Thanks, Barry, Applications AD _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
