> IMHO OPES can offer a standard way of defining and running services but > cannot prevent people from mis-using it. yes, but is there a significant need for these services outside of the mis-uses of those services? and given that a significant amount of folks seem to want these for the sole purpose of abusing the rights of content-providers, will this group basically be using IETF's reputation to try to legitimize the practice? Keith p.s. reminds me of an old Tom Lehrer song "when rockets go up, who cares where they come down...that's not my department"
- Re: WG Review: Open Pluggable Edge Se... Keith Moore
- RE: WG Review: Open Pluggable Edge Services (... Daniel Senie
- RE: WG Review: Open Pluggable Edge Services (opes) Vernon Schryver
- SMTP over TLS for this list (was: RE: WG Review: ... Paul Hoffman / IMC
- RE: WG Review: Open Pluggable Edge Services (opes) Maciocco, Christian
- Re: WG Review: Open Pluggable Edge Services (opes... Mark Nottingham
- Re: WG Review: Open Pluggable Edge Services (... Mark Nottingham
- Re: WG Review: Open Pluggable Edge Servic... Markus Hofmann
- Re: WG Review: Open Pluggable Edge Services (... Markus Hofmann
- RE: WG Review: Open Pluggable Edge Services (opes) Maciocco, Christian
- Re: WG Review: Open Pluggable Edge Services (opes... Keith Moore
- Re: WG Review: Open Pluggable Edge Services (... Michael W. Condry
- Re: WG Review: Open Pluggable Edge Servic... Keith Moore
- Re: WG Review: Open Pluggable Edge Se... Lee Rafalow
- Re: WG Review: Open Pluggable Ed... Melinda Shore
- Re: WG Review: Open Pluggabl... Keith Moore
- Re: WG Review: Open Pluggable Ed... hardie
- Re: WG Review: Open Pluggable Ed... Keith Moore
- Re: WG Review: Open Pluggabl... Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: WG Review: Open Pluggabl... Keith Moore
- Re: WG Review: Open Pluggabl... Micah Beck
