>By appearing to make it legitimate (as RFC 1918 made NAT appear >legitimate). There is a possible way to deal with this though: require an >OPES box to obtain explicit consent from both ends before executing >any content manipulation. > > Brian > Why is it not acceptable to have one host or its owner approve of such a use? Consider a web farm. How do we decide whether such "legitimate" uses will be outweighed by "illegitimate" uses? Eliot
- Re: opes and technology picks Eliot Lear
- Re: opes and technology picks Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: opes and technology picks Eliot Lear
- Re: opes and technology picks Valdis . Kletnieks
- RE: opes and technology picks Tony Hain
- Re: opes and technology picks Keith Moore
- Re: opes and technology picks Brian E Carpenter
- Re: opes and technology picks Markus Hofmann
- Re: opes and technology picks Brian E Carpenter
- Re: opes and technology picks Keith Moore
- Re: opes and technology picks Michael W. Condry
