Interesting idea but not necessarily in the scope of OPES. Certainly a ISV could offer a "list of services" so that any user or content provider could get a yes/no/don't care for each service. This fits our rule concept that OPES provides. I do not know that OPES could force ISVs to manage there business that way, however if all customers required it then either they did it that way or had no business. This might be a good item to point out in the Deployment Scenarios document. At 04:07 PM 6/21/2001 -0400, Keith Moore wrote: > > Yes, so there might be several classes of operation with different veto > > rules. > >seems like the operations should be enabled only by affirmative consent, >rather than requiring parties to veto them. Michael W. Condry Director, Network Edge Technology
- opes and technology picks Eliot Lear
- Re: opes and technology picks Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: opes and technology picks Eliot Lear
- Re: opes and technology picks Valdis . Kletnieks
- RE: opes and technology picks Tony Hain
- Re: opes and technology picks Keith Moore
- Re: opes and technology picks Brian E Carpenter
- Re: opes and technology picks Markus Hofmann
- Re: opes and technology picks Brian E Carpenter
- Re: opes and technology picks Keith Moore
- Re: opes and technology picks Michael W. Condry
- Re: opes and technology picks Keith Moore
- Re: opes and technology p... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: opes and technology p... Michael W. Condry
- Re: opes and technology p... Keith Moore
- Re: opes and technology p... Michael W. Condry
- Re: opes and technology p... Scott Brim
- Re: opes and technology p... Keith Moore
- Re: opes and technology picks Michael W. Condry
- Re: opes and technology picks Eliot Lear
- Re: opes and technology picks Vernon Schryver
