Web Services intermediaries will certainly exist and use SOAP; whether they are exactly like the current OPES model is still unclear. Indeed the security/integrity problems have to be solved, and this is more fundamental than debating the ICAP hammer and the SOAP screwdriver. Brian Keith Moore wrote: > > > Several of us have long believed that with an OPES framework, multiple > > existing remote procedure call protocols including iCAP and SOAP can > > be added to an authenticated and authorized intermediate proxy model. > > so by adding components that can alter data in transit, you're going > to increase the level of integrity? right. > > Keith
- Re: Comparison of ICAP and SOAP Mark Nottingham
- Re: Comparison of ICAP and SOAP Lee Rafalow
- Re: Comparison of ICAP and SOAP Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Comparison of ICAP and SOAP Lee Rafalow
- RE: Comparison of ICAP and SOAP Manoj Dhooria
- Re: Comparison of ICAP and SOAP John Martin
- Re: Comparison of ICAP and SOAP Randy Bush
- RE: Comparison of ICAP and SOAP Tomlinson, Gary
- RE: Comparison of ICAP and SOAP Tomlinson, Gary
- RE: Comparison of ICAP and SOAP Bernard Aboba
- Re: Comparison of ICAP and SOAP Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Comparison of ICAP and SOAP Jim Fleming
- Re: Comparison of ICAP and SOAP Mark Nottingham
- Re: Comparison of ICAP and SOAP Michael W. Condry
- Re: Comparison of ICAP and SOAP Mark Nottingham
- Re: Comparison of ICAP and SOAP Michael W. Condry
- RE: Comparison of ICAP and SOAP Hilarie Orman
- Re: Comparison of ICAP and SOAP Hilarie Orman
- RE: Comparison of ICAP and SOAP Carr, Wayne
- Re: Comparison of ICAP and SOAP Mark Nottingham
- Re: Comparison of ICAP and SOAP Valdis . Kletnieks