At 09:09 AM 7/10/2001 -0700, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>SOAP intermediaries must be explicitly targetted by the message
>(using the 'actor' attribute). In this respect, they are completely
>unlike the OPES model.
The charter says the intermediaries are explicitly addressed. I am
a bit confused by your comment.
>Of course, other kinds of intermediaries (HTTP, etc.; they may even
>be interposed with the SOAP intermediary) may make other decisions
>about messages and what to do to them.
>
>
>On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 09:57:50AM -0500, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > Web Services intermediaries will certainly exist and use SOAP; whether
> > they are exactly like the current OPES model is still unclear. Indeed
> > the security/integrity problems have to be solved, and this is more
> > fundamental than debating the ICAP hammer and the SOAP screwdriver.
> >
> > Brian
> >
> > Keith Moore wrote:
> > >
> > > > Several of us have long believed that with an OPES framework, multiple
> > > > existing remote procedure call protocols including iCAP and SOAP can
> > > > be added to an authenticated and authorized intermediate proxy model.
> > >
> > > so by adding components that can alter data in transit, you're going
> > > to increase the level of integrity? right.
> > >
> > > Keith
> >
>
>--
>Mark Nottingham, Research Scientist
>Akamai Technologies (San Mateo, CA USA)
Michael W. Condry
Director, Network Edge Technology
