----- Original Message -----
From: "Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Randy Bush" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Matt Crawford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 7:41 AM
Subject: Re: Making the IETF meeting network more representative of the real
world
>
> >> I liked Tony Hain's suggestion that the future IETF terminal room/
> >> wireless LAN ntworks should offer NATted IPv4 and plain IPv6, to
> >> better reflect the choices available to much of the world.
> >i wish i could agree that they are, but the transition plan seems to
> >have a lot of nats in it. <sigh>
>
> you should better practice using before IETF54 (Yokohama Japan),
> as we may deploy IPv6-only terminal cluster :-):-):-)
>
> seriously, with the address allocation policy/status in JP I guess
> IETF54 term room may have to use IPv4 NAT or something alike.
> If you use IPv6, you should be safe. So it's better to prepare today
> than tomorrow.
>
> itojun
>
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg12342.html
VHS vs. BETAMAX....
----------------------------------
> as a temporary measure I have configured tunnel to IIJ Palo Alto device.
> the IPv6 prefix for the meeting room is 3ffe:507:1ff::/64.
>
> it would be, of course, better to have ipv6 prefix from microsoft
> research :-)
today we've got a router operated by MS research guys, using 6to4.
so my router have went away.
2002:836b:2505:5::/64
----------------------------------
Do you support the new TLDs ?
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg12215.html
"Proof of Concept TLD Development...and Multiple TLD Clusters"
Jim Fleming
GO Nuclear....Drop the COM !
http://www.DOT-NZ.com
http://www.NZ.Registry
6:130 - NZ World
