*> I'm still waiting *> for somebody to tell me that RFC1098 was an even more subtle joke. ;) *> Neat point (as well as a good in-joke). The date field in the RFC index for RFC 1098 is incorrect; we will change it to match RFC 1098 itself, which bears the date "April 1989". RFC Editor
- Re: April Foolish Bob Braden
- Re: April Foolish RFC Editor
