Thank you for bringing this to our attention.
It is being corrected.
RFC Editor
> From \[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 10 09:05:18 2001
> From: Bob Braden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 16:03:39 GMT
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: April Foolish
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII
> Content-Length: 298
>
>
> *> I'm still waiting
> *> for somebody to tell me that RFC1098 was an even more subtle joke. ;)
> *>
>
>
> Neat point (as well as a good in-joke). The date field in the RFC
> index for RFC 1098 is incorrect; we will change it to match RFC
> 1098 itself, which bears the date "April 1989".
>
> RFC Editor
>
