> christian - i'd like to understand any technical concerns you might > have on the "soap over beep" specification. Well, I am mostly concerned to see "SOAP over BEEP" defined before we define the alternative "SOAP over TCP". I mean, if we are transporting opaque blobs of data between two points, TCP looks like a no-brainer... -- Christian Huitema
- RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard Clemm, Geoff
- RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard Christian Huitema
- RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard Clemm, Geoff
- RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard Eamon O'Tuathail
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard Marshall T. Rose
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard Christian Huitema
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Stand... Marshall T. Rose
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Stand... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed S... Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Propos... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Pr... Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Pr... Mark Baker
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP ... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in B... Mark Baker
- RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard Eamon O'Tuathail
- Re-visiting the jutification for BEEP Dave Crocker
