At 02:13 PM 9/10/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This was put forward specifically as work reviewed >in the IETF but not the product of an IETF working group. >Is that in error? Should this have been put forward as >the work of the beep working group? Ted, the observation was about behavior, not formal mandate. It was presented to a relevant working group. d/ ---------- Dave Crocker <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com> tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.273.6464
- RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed S... Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Stand... Allison Mankin
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed S... Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Propos... Allison Mankin
- Last Call as a Pedagogy Moment Dave Crocker
- RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Stand... Patrik Fältström
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Stand... Marshall T. Rose
- RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard Clemm, Geoff
- RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard Christian Huitema
- RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard Clemm, Geoff
- RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard Eamon O'Tuathail
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard Marshall T. Rose
- RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard Christian Huitema
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Stand... Marshall T. Rose
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Stand... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed S... Dave Crocker