On 21 Feb 2012, at 22:37, David Chadwick <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hmmm. the design of this is very questionnable (and opaque). I would happen to agree, but they have their reasons for their design, some of which almost make sense by the light of the full moon. > Full trust must be given to the gateway, without any assurance that it is > trustworthy. Their view is that it is operated by HMG, why shouldn't it be trustworthy? Some may argue the opposite for exactly the same reason :-). > It is not even mentioned in the trust assurance document. What trust assurance document? R. Sent from my iPhone _______________________________________________ ietf-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy
