On 05-May-14 15:30, Avri Doria wrote: > Hi, > > Me too, just back from two weeks of talking policy in NETmundial and the > UN's WG on Enhanced Cooperation. Policy definitely figured into the
Privacy and surveillance (aka pervasive monitoring) figured into the > policy discussions. And I did pass on the existence of the project in > various conversations. Have also extended an invitation to the > technically minded privacy experts to join in the effort. > > Was thinking about the need for status and remembered that we had set > mid-May as the status update point. > > Quick check: > > - there are 8 entries for drafts in > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/ppm-legacy-review/ > > - no changes in 5 weeks. > > I have yet to read any. Will do so and give a better update in a week. > > avri > > > > avri > > > > On 05-May-14 14:47, Scott Brim wrote: >> Personally I got taken off on a severe sidetrack and I'm just getting >> back to it. >> >> >> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Hannes Tschofenig >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I was wondering what the status of the review activities is. >> Various folks expressed interest to do some reviews at the last f2f >> meeting in London. >> >> Did anything happen already? >> >> Ciao >> Hannes >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ietf-privacy mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ietf-privacy mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy >> > > _______________________________________________ > ietf-privacy mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy > > _______________________________________________ ietf-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy
