Hi, Though I might add there there is much utility in discussing these reviews.
Discussing them on this list might be an idea. avri On 06-May-14 08:23, Scott Brim wrote: > On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 12:57 AM, Christian Huitema <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > I wrote 6 of those. I could go on reviewing more stuff, but the lack of > feedback made me believe that the exercise was futile... > > > Channeling Stephen maybe ... the goal was not to get immediate feedback > or cause immediate changes. That has to happen in the mainline process > for modifying or extending RFCs. Instead, the goal is to build up a > repository of comments on existing RFCs so that whenever they are > revisited (for modification or extension), the people doing so will have > a privacy review to refer to. > > Scott _______________________________________________ ietf-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy
