Hi SM, Linus, On 15/06/14 13:14, Linus Nordberg wrote: > S Moonesamy <[email protected]> wrote > Thu, 05 Jun 2014 23:39:53 -0700: > > | I suggest that the BCP be reconsidered given the lack of privacy > | considerations. > > +1
Q: How will that happen? A: Someone will need to write an I-D:-) If someone does such an I-D that is reasonable and improves privacy, I'll be happy to help that progress. Not sure if the BCP's RFC would need replacing or if updating the BCP with a 2nd RFC would be right myself, so talking to the original authors and/or the intarea list would seem wise. They might also have other stuff they'd like to revise, who knows. (The draft leading to this BCP [1] was an intarea [2] draft.) S. [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6302/ [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/intarea/ > > _______________________________________________ > ietf-privacy mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy > > _______________________________________________ ietf-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy
