Hi Stephen,
At 05:51 15-06-2014, Stephen Farrell wrote:
Q: How will that happen?
A: Someone will need to write an I-D:-)
If someone does such an I-D that is reasonable and improves
privacy, I'll be happy to help that progress.
Ok.
Not sure if the BCP's RFC would need replacing or if updating
the BCP with a 2nd RFC would be right myself, so talking to
the original authors and/or the intarea list would seem wise.
They might also have other stuff they'd like to revise, who
knows. (The draft leading to this BCP [1] was an intarea [2]
draft.)
In theory a (future) RFC can be added to BCP 162. In practice people
won't read it or miss it. A first step might be to talk to the
authors to see what they would like to do. The INTAREA working group
[1] lacks the expertise to review privacy-related drafts. People
with an actual interest in privacy will have to participate in the
working group and review the proposed update to BCP 162.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
1. https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/intarea/
_______________________________________________
ietf-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy
