ietf-smtp  

Messages by Date

• 2008/10/27 Re: RFC 3207 STARTTLS Tony Finch
• 2008/10/26 Re: SMTP 500 Line too long ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/10/26 SMTP 500 Line too long Ivar Lumi
• 2008/10/26 Re: RFC 3207 STARTTLS Alessandro Vesely
• 2008/10/25 Re: RFC 3207 STARTTLS Willie Gillespie
• 2008/10/25 Re: RFC 3207 STARTTLS Alessandro Vesely
• 2008/10/24 Re: RFC 3207 STARTTLS John C Klensin
• 2008/10/24 Re: RFC 3207 STARTTLS SM
• 2008/10/24 Re: RFC 3207 STARTTLS Tony Finch
• 2008/10/24 Re: RFC 3207 STARTTLS John C Klensin
• 2008/10/24 Re: RFC 3207 STARTTLS Tony Finch
• 2008/10/23 Re: RFC 3207 STARTTLS Hector Santos
• 2008/10/23 Re: RFC 3207 STARTTLS Nate Leon
• 2008/10/23 RE: [mail-vet-discuss] Straw consensus call on auth-header draft Mark Crispin
• 2008/10/23 Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Straw consensus call on auth-header draft Douglas Otis
• 2008/10/23 Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Straw consensus call on auth-header draft Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2008/10/23 Re: RFC 3207 STARTTLS Paul Hoffman
• 2008/10/23 Re: RFC 3207 STARTTLS John C Klensin
• 2008/10/23 Re: RFC 3207 STARTTLS John C Klensin
• 2008/10/23 Re: RFC 3207 STARTTLS Alexey Melnikov
• 2008/10/23 Re: RFC 3207 STARTTLS John C Klensin
• 2008/10/23 Re: RFC 3207 STARTTLS Alexey Melnikov
• 2008/10/23 Re: RFC 3207 STARTTLS Alexey Melnikov
• 2008/10/23 Re: RFC 3207 STARTTLS Ivar Lumi
• 2008/10/23 Re: RFC 3207 STARTTLS Matti Aarnio
• 2008/10/23 Re: RFC 3207 STARTTLS SM
• 2008/10/23 Re: RFC 3207 STARTTLS Philip Guenther
• 2008/10/23 RFC 3207 STARTTLS Ivar Lumi
• 2008/10/22 Re: RFC 5321 4.4 Received BNF ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/10/22 RFC 5321 4.4 Received BNF Ivar Lumi
• 2008/10/21 Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Straw consensus call on auth-header draft Douglas Otis
• 2008/10/15 Re: Straw consensus call on auth-header draft Hector Santos
• 2008/10/14 Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Straw consensus call on auth-header draft Steve Atkins
• 2008/10/14 Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Straw consensus call on auth-header draft Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2008/10/14 Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Straw consensus call on auth-header draft Douglas Otis
• 2008/10/14 Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Straw consensus call on auth-header draft Dave CROCKER
• 2008/10/13 Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Straw consensus call on auth-header draft SM
• 2008/10/13 Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Straw consensus call on auth-header draft Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2008/10/13 Re: Straw consensus call on auth-header draft Dave CROCKER
• 2008/10/13 Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Straw consensus call on auth-header draft Dave CROCKER
• 2008/10/13 Re: Straw consensus call on auth-header draft Lisa Dusseault
• 2008/10/13 Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Straw consensus call on auth-header draft Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2008/10/13 Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Straw consensus call on auth-header draft Alexey Melnikov
• 2008/10/13 Re: Straw consensus call on auth-header draft Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2008/10/12 Re: Straw consensus call on auth-header draft Dave CROCKER
• 2008/10/12 Straw consensus call on auth-header draft Lisa Dusseault
• 2008/10/08 FWD: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5321 (1543) John C Klensin
• 2008/10/06 Re: 5321 and 5322 are published! Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• 2008/10/02 Re: 5321 and 5322 are published! Keith Moore
• 2008/10/02 Re: 5321 and 5322 are published! Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2008/10/01 Re: 5321 and 5322 are published! John C Klensin
• 2008/10/01 Re: 5321 and 5322 are published! SM
• 2008/10/01 Re: 5321 and 5322 are published! Hector Santos
• 2008/10/01 5321 and 5322 are published! Tony Hansen
• 2008/09/21 fyi re 2821bis and 2822upd Tony Hansen
• 2008/08/26 [Fwd: Protocol Action: 'Internet Message Format' to Draft Standard] Tony Hansen
• 2008/08/20 Re: 2822upd approved Tony Hansen
• 2008/08/19 Re: retry question Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2008/08/16 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/08/16 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) John C Klensin
• 2008/08/15 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) Hector Santos
• 2008/08/15 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/08/14 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) Hector Santos
• 2008/08/14 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) Tony Finch
• 2008/08/13 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) John C Klensin
• 2008/08/13 DATA reply codes - which ones? Hector Santos
• 2008/08/13 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) John C Klensin
• 2008/08/13 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) Hector Santos
• 2008/08/13 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) Tony Hansen
• 2008/08/13 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) Bart Schaefer
• 2008/08/13 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) Frank Ellermann
• 2008/08/13 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) Tony Finch
• 2008/08/13 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) Frank Ellermann
• 2008/08/13 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) Tony Finch
• 2008/08/12 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) Hector Santos
• 2008/08/12 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) John C Klensin
• 2008/08/12 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) Bart Schaefer
• 2008/08/12 Re: SendMail follows a NO RETRY 5yz logic as defined by specs. Philip Guenther
• 2008/08/12 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) John C Klensin
• 2008/08/12 Re: Retry Strategies John C Klensin
• 2008/08/12 Re: Retry Strategies Paul Smith
• 2008/08/12 Re: SendMail follows a NO RETRY 5yz logic as defined by specs. Frank Ellermann
• 2008/08/12 Re: SendMail follows a NO RETRY 5yz logic as defined by specs. Hector Santos
• 2008/08/12 Retry Strategies Hector Santos
• 2008/08/12 Re: SendMail follows a NO RETRY 5yz logic as defined by specs. Frank Ellermann
• 2008/08/11 Re: SendMail follows a NO RETRY 5yz logic as defined by specs. Philip Guenther
• 2008/08/11 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) Hector Santos
• 2008/08/11 Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not. Glenn Anderson
• 2008/08/11 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question) John R Levine
• 2008/08/11 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question) Jeff Macdonald
• 2008/08/11 Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not. Alessandro Vesely
• 2008/08/11 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) Paul Smith
• 2008/08/11 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) SM
• 2008/08/11 Signalling to retry RCPTs separately John Leslie
• 2008/08/11 Re: retry question Tony Finch
• 2008/08/11 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) Hector Santos
• 2008/08/11 retries redux? was Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not. Tony Finch
• 2008/08/11 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)) SM
• 2008/08/11 Re: SendMail follows a NO RETRY 5yz logic as defined by specs. SM
• 2008/08/11 Re: retry question Paul Smith
• 2008/08/11 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) John Leslie
• 2008/08/11 Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not. Tony Finch
• 2008/08/11 Re: retry question Tony Finch
• 2008/08/11 Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not. Paul Smith
• 2008/08/11 Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not. Paul Smith
• 2008/08/11 Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not. Hector Santos
• 2008/08/11 Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not. Hector Santos
• 2008/08/11 Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not. Paul Smith
• 2008/08/11 Re: SendMail follows a NO RETRY 5yz logic as defined by specs. Frank Ellermann
• 2008/08/11 Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not. Paul Smith
• 2008/08/11 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)) Paul Smith
• 2008/08/11 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) Paul Smith
• 2008/08/11 Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not. Alessandro Vesely
• 2008/08/11 SendMail follows a NO RETRY 5yz logic as defined by specs. Hector Santos
• 2008/08/10 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) Hector Santos
• 2008/08/10 Re: retry question SM
• 2008/08/10 Re: retry question SM
• 2008/08/10 Re: retry question SM
• 2008/08/10 Re: retry question SM
• 2008/08/10 Re: Retry question Hector Santos
• 2008/08/10 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) Hector Santos
• 2008/08/10 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) Frank Ellermann
• 2008/08/10 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)) Hector Santos
• 2008/08/10 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)) Hector Santos
• 2008/08/10 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)) Dave Crocker
• 2008/08/10 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)) John C Klensin
• 2008/08/10 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)) Glenn Anderson
• 2008/08/10 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)) ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/08/10 Re: Retry question Tony Finch
• 2008/08/10 Re: Retry question Pete Resnick
• 2008/08/10 Re: Retry question Hector Santos
• 2008/08/10 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)) Hector Santos
• 2008/08/10 Re: Retry question Pete Resnick
• 2008/08/10 Re: Retry question Bill McQuillan
• 2008/08/10 Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)) ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/08/10 Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not. ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/08/10 Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not. Hector Santos
• 2008/08/10 Re: Retry question Pete Resnick
• 2008/08/10 Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios Hector Santos
• 2008/08/10 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)) Frank Ellermann
• 2008/08/10 Re: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis) Glenn Anderson
• 2008/08/10 Re: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis) Hector Santos
• 2008/08/10 Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not. Glenn Anderson
• 2008/08/10 Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not. Hector Santos
• 2008/08/10 Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios Glenn Anderson
• 2008/08/10 Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios Hector Santos
• 2008/08/10 Re: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis) ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/08/10 Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not. ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/08/10 Re: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis) Hector Santos
• 2008/08/10 Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios Glenn Anderson
• 2008/08/10 DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not. Hector Santos
• 2008/08/10 Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios Hector Santos
• 2008/08/10 Re: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis) John C Klensin
• 2008/08/10 Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios Glenn Anderson
• 2008/08/10 Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios Hector Santos
• 2008/08/10 Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios Glenn Anderson
• 2008/08/10 Re: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis) Hector Santos
• 2008/08/10 Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios Hector Santos
• 2008/08/09 Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios Glenn Anderson
• 2008/08/09 Re: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis) Bill McQuillan
• 2008/08/09 Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios Hector Santos
• 2008/08/09 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis) Hector Santos
• 2008/08/09 Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios Glenn Anderson
• 2008/08/09 Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios Hector Santos
• 2008/08/09 Re: Pipelining the DATA Command ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/08/09 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question) ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/08/09 Re: retry question ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/08/09 Re: Pipelining the DATA Command Glenn Anderson
• 2008/08/09 Re: retry question Hector Santos
• 2008/08/09 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question) Robert A. Rosenberg
• 2008/08/09 Pipelining the DATA Command Robert A. Rosenberg
• 2008/08/09 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures Hector Santos
• 2008/08/09 Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios Glenn Anderson
• 2008/08/09 Re: retry question Frank Ellermann
• 2008/08/09 Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios Hector Santos
• 2008/08/09 Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios Hector Santos
• 2008/08/09 Re: retry question Hector Santos
• 2008/08/09 Re: retry question SM
• 2008/08/09 Re: retry question SM
• 2008/08/09 Re: retry question Robert A. Rosenberg
• 2008/08/09 Re: retry question Robert A. Rosenberg
• 2008/08/09 Re: retry question Frank Ellermann
• 2008/08/09 Re: retry question John C Klensin
• 2008/08/09 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question) Paul Smith
• 2008/08/09 Re: retry question ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/08/09 Re: retry question Frank Ellermann
• 2008/08/09 Re: retry question Tony Finch
• 2008/08/09 Re: retry question John Leslie
• 2008/08/09 Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios Frank Ellermann
• 2008/08/09 Re: retry question (was: 2821bis/ter and procedures) ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/08/09 Re: retry question ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/08/09 Improved straw man for retry scenarios John Levine
• 2008/08/09 Re: retry question Frank Ellermann
• 2008/08/09 Re: retry question Hector Santos
• 2008/08/09 retry question (was: 2821bis/ter and procedures) SM
• 2008/08/09 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures Richard Kay
• 2008/08/09 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question) Alex van den Bogaerdt
• 2008/08/09 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question) Alex van den Bogaerdt
• 2008/08/09 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question) Alex van den Bogaerdt
• 2008/08/09 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question) Alex van den Bogaerdt

• Earlier messages
• Later messages